Daniel Knittl-Frank <knittl89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > An interesting fact (and intentional behavior?) is that describing a > commit with only a lightweight tag will properly display the tags/ > prefix. I assume this is because the annotated tags only store the > tagname without any ref namespace, which is then picked up by git > describe and displayed. I suspect that "see if the name recorded in the tag object matches the name of the ref that stores the tag after refs/tags/" code *is* not just verifying what it claims to (which may be good) but also unintentionally affecting the output (i.e. "--all" promises that the prefix tags/ should be shown). Perhaps the code needs to be fixed if that is the case.
