Re: StGIT and conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/05/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The current behavior of StGIT is to not use the index for conflicts
like git does. What advantages does this have that are great enough to
motivate a deviation from the git behavior?

I don't think there are any advantages in deviating from the git
behaviour, only that when I first implementing it, git didn't have any
smarter behaviour and I used diff3 (or other external merger, which
can be used right now as well).

I'm not sure if git-diff still works when there are conflicts in the
index. The current stg behaviour is to reset the index to the base of
the patch and a stg diff would show the diff (including the config
markers) to the base. I find this quite handy.

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux