Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > + if test "$branch_or_commit" = "HEAD" && > + !(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD) Did you need a subshell here? Now with a proper test with "symbolic-ref -q HEAD", I wonder if you'd need to check if the original was named HEAD in the first place (I do not feel strongly enough to say that checking is wrong, at least not yet, but the above does make me wonder), and instead something like if ! git symbolic-ref -q HEAD then ... might be sufficient. I dunno. I find what 2/3 and 3/3 want to do quite sensible. They depend on 1/3, which I find is more a needless churn than a clean-up, which is unfortunate, though. Thanks.
