Re: [PATCH] git-status.txt: mention --no-optional-locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 27 November 2017 11:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
+using `git --no-optional-locks status` (see linkgit:git[1] for details).

It strikes me just now that `--no-side-effects` might have been a better name for the option (of course, iff this avoid all kinds of side effects. I'm not sure about the side affects other than index refreshing of "git status"). And in case we didn't care about the predictability of option names even a little, `--do-what-i-say` might have been a catchy alternative ;-)


---
Kaartic



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux