Re: [PATCH] recursive submodules: detach HEAD from new state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Stefan, do you know what thread I should look at to find the current
>> state of this patch?  I've had it applied locally for a long time.
>
> It was "Undecided" for some time, then Junio kicked it back to pu, expecting a
> reroll[1]. The "send out a plan" that was referenced is found in [2]
> describing 6 plans for the future of submodules. The approach in [3]
> which is different on the implementation level, but very similar on
> the UX level sounds best currently.  I'll coordinate with JTan to
> come up with patches for that.
>
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kYUZv0g+3OEMrbT26A7mSLJzeS-yf5Knr-CnARHqVB=aQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/20171109001007.11894-1-sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [3] https://public-inbox.org/git/20171108172945.33c42a0e91b4ac494217b788@xxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks.  That thread appears to be about a long-term plan; what is the
short-term plan?

E.g. is there any additional documentation that should be added to the
patch that detaches?

Or should it go in as-is?

Thanks,
Jonathan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux