Am 20.11.2017 um 21:39 schrieb Stefan Beller:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:08 AM, René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Non-empty lines before a function definition are most likely comments
>> for that function and thus relevant. Include them in function context.
>>
>> Such a non-empty line might also belong to the preceding function if
>> there is no separating blank line. Stop extending the context upwards
>> also at the next function line to make sure only one extra function body
>> is shown at most.
>
> Can we add another heuristic, that checks for common function body ends, e.g.
> if the preceding line contains '}' but is not commented (the line doesn't
> contain '*/' '//', '#'), we have a strong hint that it is a function, not an
> additional comment.
C comments containing "}" as part of the text would only be shown
partially, e.g:
/*
* Not shown because of the curly closing brace in ${PATH}.
* Shown.
*/
Two examples in git's repo are in refs.h and sha1-lookup.c.
Before diving deeper: Is it worth it? Does the heuristic in this series
produce excessive context often? Enough to be annoying?
Thanks,
René
