On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:37:03PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > +int git_config_expiry_date(timestamp_t *timestamp, const char *var, const char *value)
>> > +{
>> > + if (!value)
>> > + return config_error_nonbool(var);
>> > + if (parse_expiry_date(value, timestamp))
>> > + return error(_("'%s' for '%s' is not a valid timestamp"),
>> > + value, var);
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>>
>> I think this is more correct even within the context of this
>> function than dying, which suggests the need for a slightly related
>> (which is not within the scope of this change) clean-up within this
>> file as a #leftoverbits task. I think dying in these value parsers
>> goes against the point of having die_on_error bit in the
>> config-source structure; Heiko and Peff CC'ed for b2dc0945 ("do not
>> die when error in config parsing of buf occurs", 2013-07-12).
>
> Yes, I agree that ideally the value parsers should avoid dying.
> Unfortunately I think it will involve some heavy refactoring, since
> git_config_bool(), for instance, does not even have a spot in its
> interface to return an error.
>
> Of course we can leave those other helpers in place and add a "gently"
> form for each. It is really only submodule-config.c that wants to be
> careful in its callback, so we could just port that. Skimming it over,
> it looks like there are a few git_config_bool() and straight-up die()
> calls that could be more forgiving.
>
> +cc Stefan, who added the die(). It may be that we don't care that much
> these days about recovering from broken .gitmodules files.
By that you mean commits like 37f52e9344 (submodule-config:
keep shallow recommendation around, 2016-05-26) for example?
That adds a git_config_bool to the submodule config machinery.
I agree that we'd want to be more careful, but for now I'd put it to the
#leftoverbits.
Thanks,
Stefan
