Re: [PATCH] config: avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) != len" pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/11/17 22:06, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:40:43PM +0000, Phillip Wood wrote:
> 
>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> As explained in commit 06f46f237 (avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len)
>> != len" pattern, 2017–09–13) the return value of write_in_full() is
>> either -1 or the requested number of bytes. As such comparing the
>> return value to an unsigned value such as strbuf.len will fail to
>> catch errors. Change the code to use the preferred '< 0' check.
> 
> Thanks for catching this. I wondered at first how I missed these obvious
> cases, but the answer is that they were added after my commit. :)
> 
> There's one more case in write_section() that uses "==". That's not
> actually wrong, but I wonder if we'd want to make it "< 0" for
> consistency.

Yes, I noticed that but didn't get round to looking at it properly the
other day. Rene's fix looks good to me.

Best Wishes

Phillip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux