Re: [PATCH] sequencer: reschedule pick if index can't be locked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 November 2017 at 11:43, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15/11/17 18:44, Martin Ågren wrote:
>>
>> On 15 November 2017 at 11:41, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  From the commit message, I would have expected the flags to be zero. This
>> patch
>> does not only turn off the die-ing, it also tells the lockfile-API to
>> print an
>> error message before returning. I don't have an opinion on whether that
>> extra
>> verboseness is good or bad, but if it's wanted, I think the commit message
>> should mention this change.
>
>
> Hi Martin, thanks for your comments. LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR also prints the same
> warning so that behavior is unchanged by this patch, though mentioning it in
> the commit message would be no bad thing.

Argh, you're right of course. Sorry for this.

Martin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux