Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Are you happy with the '--signoff' is handled (I didn't modify my > changes in the last iteration as you were still thinking about it)? I am not, but I am not unhappy, either. As I understand from your responses, it seems that the existing code had an untriggerable mess and the patch replaced it with another that is also untriggerable, and if that is the case, well, we do not have an immediate need to clean it up either way, so... ;-)
