Re: [PATCH 06/30] directory rename detection: testcases to avoid taking detection too far

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> +# Testcase 3a, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
>> +#   (Related to testcases 1c and 1f)
>> +#   Commit A: z/{b,c,d}
>> +#   Commit B: z/{b,c,d} (no change)
>
> This could also be an unrelated change such as adding w/e?

Yes, precisely.  Whenever I have a "no change" commit, the intent is
that there may be unrelated changes involved, they've just been
excluded from the testcase in order to make it minimal.

>> +#   Commit C: y/{b,c}, x/d
>> +#   Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux