Re: [RFC] cover-at-tip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <NMoreyChaisemartin@xxxxxxx> writes:

> I agree this is a "am" job. Was just wondering if reusing some of
> the code from apply (and move it so it makes more sense) wouldnd't
> make more sense than rewriting a patch detection function.

Yes, I understood that and have already given an answer, no?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux