Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I do think there are a few ugly bits in the result (like that > initializer for packed_git_mru :) ), so I'd prefer not to merge this > down until we do that final step. > > So the big question is: who wants to do it? > > I think you've done a good job here, and this would count for your > Outreachy application's contribution. But if you'd like to do that next > step, you are welcome to. > > We could also consider it a #leftoverbits that perhaps some other > Outreachy candidate would pick up[1]. > > In the meantime, Junio, I think we'd want to queue this with the intent > to graduate it to "pu" or possibly "next", but not "master". Then if > somebody (Olga or another applicant) produces the endgame patch, we can > queue it on top and move it further. And if nobody does, I can pick it > after the application period is over. So... do we still want to keep this in 'next', or does somebody wants to do honors? I'd really prefer *not* to see you or me ending up finishing it up, but at the same time, I really hate seeing a halfway or 3/4 done topic hanging around in 'pu'. > [1] For those who find this mail through the archive, there's more > discussion in this thread: > > https://public-inbox.org/git/CAL21BmnvJSaN+Tnw7Hdc5P5biAnM5dfWR7gX5FrAG1r_D8th=A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
