Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > With traverse_trees_and_blobs factored out of the main traverse function, > the next patch can introduce an in-order revision walking with ease. > > In the next patch we'll call `traverse_trees_and_blobs` from within the > loop walking the commits, such that we'll have one invocation of that > function per commit. That is why we do not want to have memory allocations > in that function, such as we'd have if we were to use a strbuf locally. > Pass a strbuf from traverse_commit_list into the blob and tree traversing > function as a scratch pad that only needs to be allocated once. Makes sense. I still don't think base_path is any clearer than base that was used in the original, though.
