On 10/30/2017 1:31 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jt/partial-clone-lazy-fetch (2017-10-02) 18 commits
- fetch-pack: restore save_commit_buffer after use
- unpack-trees: batch fetching of missing blobs
- clone: configure blobmaxbytes in created repos
- clone: support excluding large blobs
- fetch: support excluding large blobs
- fetch: refactor calculation of remote list
- fetch-pack: support excluding large blobs
- pack-objects: support --blob-max-bytes
- pack-objects: rename want_.* to ignore_.*
- gc: do not repack promisor packfiles
- rev-list: support termination at promisor objects
- sha1_file: support lazily fetching missing objects
- introduce fetch-object: fetch one promisor object
- index-pack: refactor writing of .keep files
- fsck: support promisor objects as CLI argument
- fsck: support referenced promisor objects
- fsck: support refs pointing to promisor objects
- fsck: introduce partialclone extension
A journey for "git clone" and "git fetch" to become "lazier" by
depending more on its remote repository---this is the beginning of
it.
Expecting a reroll.
cf. <CAGf8dgLu-TeK8KbHv-U+18O+L2TxKcGv5vFFHy38J6a_YXRfew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It was my understanding that Jeff's heavy-lifting produced a shorter,
initial patch series with parts of this, that was already reviewed
internally by Jonathan.
Am I mistaken?
Ciao,
Dscho
Right. I posted a "part 1" of this last week and am currently
rerolling that. I should also have a followup "part 2" patch
series shortly.
https://public-inbox.org/git/20171024185332.57261-1-git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I've been assuming that the jt/partial-clone-lazy-fetch is a
placeholder for our next combined patch series.
Jeff
