Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Add structure representing hash algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 09:36:05PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:12 PM, brian m. carlson
> <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,49 @@ const struct object_id empty_blob_oid = {
> > +static inline void git_hash_sha1_init(void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       git_SHA1_Init((git_SHA_CTX *)ctx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void git_hash_sha1_update(void *ctx, const void *data, size_t len)
> > +{
> > +       git_SHA1_Update((git_SHA_CTX *)ctx, data, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void git_hash_sha1_final(unsigned char *hash, void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       git_SHA1_Final(hash, (git_SHA_CTX *)ctx);
> > +}
> 
> Why 'inline' if you only ever take the addresses of these functions?

Good point.  I wanted to avoid the overhead of a needless intermediate
function call when using this code path and have the compiler
essentially emit a call to the underlying functions directly, but inline
probably won't affect whether that happens.

I'll remove them.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux