Hi Junio, On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * cc/git-packet-pm (2017-10-22) 6 commits > - Git/Packet.pm: extract parts of t0021/rot13-filter.pl for reuse > - t0021/rot13-filter: add capability functions > - t0021/rot13-filter: add packet_initialize() > - t0021/rot13-filter: improve error message > - t0021/rot13-filter: improve 'if .. elsif .. else' style > - t0021/rot13-filter: refactor packet reading functions > > Parts of a test to drive the long-running content filter interface > has been split into its own module, hopefully to eventually become > reusable. > > Expecting a reroll. > The original unfortunately is quite broken in error detection > cases to make the result sub-par as a standalone module before it > gets fixed. Would you terribly mind adding a SQUASH??? with my suggested fix for PERL_NO_MAKEMAKER? Otherwise, the Windows build will keep failing for `pu`. > * jr/ssh-wrappers (2017-10-24) 5 commits > - ssh: 'simple' variant does not support --port > - ssh: 'simple' variant does not support -4/-6 > - ssh: 'auto' variant to select between 'ssh' and 'simple' > - connect: split ssh command line options into separate function > - connect: split git:// setup into a separate function > (this branch uses bw/protocol-v1.) Likewise, this needs a SQUASH??? to remove the uplink$X before (over-)writing uplink, to pass the test suite on Windows. Of course, if we could eventually have Continuous Testing of individual *branches* (instead of `pu`), then we would not have to see those test failures in every effing single build of `pu`. I mean, there is no need to test things after they were tested already, and failed, right? Ciao, Dscho
