Re: [PATCH 1/3] list-objects.c: factor out traverse_trees_and_blobs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stefan,

[I was intrigued enough by your work to postpone to later this coming week
reading the What's cooking email in favor of reviewing your patch series.]

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Stefan Beller wrote:

> With traverse_trees_and_blobs factored out of the main traverse function,
> the next patch can introduce an in-order revision walking with ease.

Makes sense.

> diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
> index b3931fa434..0ee0551604 100644
> --- a/list-objects.c
> +++ b/list-objects.c
> @@ -183,25 +183,13 @@ static void add_pending_tree(struct rev_info *revs, struct tree *tree)
>  	add_pending_object(revs, &tree->object, "");
>  }
>  
> -void traverse_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs,
> -			  show_commit_fn show_commit,
> -			  show_object_fn show_object,
> -			  void *data)
> +static void traverse_trees_and_blobs(struct rev_info *revs,
> +				     struct strbuf *base,

In the context of one function, it was obvious what `base` meant. Maybe we
can call it `base_path` now?

Thanks,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux