Re: [PATCH v16 Part II 5/8] bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` shell function in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 October 2017 at 17:06, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +               /*
> +                * have bad (or new) but not good (or old). We could bisect
> +                * although this is less optimum.
> +                */
> +               fprintf(stderr, _("Warning: bisecting only with a %s commit\n"),
> +                       terms->term_bad);

Maybe this should use `warning()`?

> -               # have bad (or new) but not good (or old).  we could bisect although
> -               # this is less optimum.
> -               eval_gettextln "Warning: bisecting only with a \$TERM_BAD commit." >&2

I wonder if we can somehow pick up the existing translation? It would
now be fuzzy, in some sense, but since the string was originally in a
different file, maybe the po-tools won't be able to discover the
fuzzyness? We could add a TRANSLATORS-comment, so that the translators
know that this string matches an old one. There are more strings like
that in this patch, and maybe in some others as well, I haven't looked.

(Adding Jiang to cc.)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux