> On 25 Oct 2017, at 19:13, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi again, > > Lars Schneider wrote: >>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 20:14, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> In any event, you also probably want to declare what you're doing >>> using .gitattributes. By checking in the files as CRLF, you are >>> declaring that you do *not* want Git to treat them as text files >>> (i.e., you do not want Git to change the line endings), so something >>> as simple as >>> >>> * -text >> >> That's sounds good. Does "-text" have any other implications? >> For whatever reason I always thought this is the way to tell >> Git that a particular file is binary with the implication that >> Git should not attempt to diff it. > > No other implications. You're thinking of "-diff". There is also a > shortcut "binary" which simply means "-text -diff". Yeah. Well, when I read "-text" then I think "no text" and that makes me think "is binary". > Ideas for wording improvements to gitattributes(5) on this subject? I think the wording in the docs is good. It is just the "text" keyword that confused me. Maybe this could have been names "eolnorm" and "-eolnorm" or something. But it is too late for that now I guess :-) Thanks, Lars