hoi :) On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:32:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > As an internal symbol, S_IFDIRLNK makes _much_ more sense than > S_IFGITLINK, exactly because it is a mixture of S_IFDIR and > S_IFLNK. But then we also should be consequent and rename the entire low-level plumbing to dirlink. I don't see a reason to keep both. For me the S_ macro names are about the file type which is represented by them. The fact that dirlinks/gitlinks are represented as DIR + LNK is nice but not so important that we have to name the macro that way. -- Martin Waitz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
