Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hello, >> I think this way is better for user experience: >> * git doesn't crash; >> * warning is shown; >> * commit has been successfully created then it's safe to show a summary message >> with already known information and without resolved HEAD. > > I'm on the fence between this and the die_errno() version. Given that > this would basically never happen in practice, I don't think it matters > too much. And that makes me want to just err on the side of simplicity. > But it's not like this is all that complex, either. True. I've queued v3 for now. Thanks, both.
