On 17/10/2017 19:30, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 17.10.2017 um 01:01 schrieb Rafael Ascensao: >>> This is worth discussing, though not my preference. The picture to "pick >>> cherries" has become quite common, and now that we use it for the name of >>> the command, "cherry-pick", the direction of flow is quite obvious and >>> strongly implied: from somewhere else to me (and not to somebody else). >> >> What if we borrow '--onto' from rebase and make it cherry-pick --onto >> <destination>? > > I actually like this. Although I would miss the convenience that the > source defaults to HEAD. Unless we make a special case for --onto, > that is, of course. I second this. >From my point of view, I would say that "cherry-pick" in general seems to just imply "taking" commits (picking "cherries"), where direction flow is irrelevant, or at least not strongly implied. For me, it`s more "from somewhere else to somebody else", indeed. The fact that it currently "posts" its picks "to me" (on top of current HEAD) could very well be justified/explained as the most obvious case (at time of implementation, at least), where usually one does work "here" (HEAD), thus cares to have commits picked over "here" as well - but it doesn`t have to be a restriction, where other destination besides HEAD could/should be allowed. Anyway, I`d say current behaviour without "--onto" should stay, indeed, where HEAD destination is implied if not otherwise specified (and that seems to align well with some other Git commands, too). Also, in case "--onto" _is_ provided, maybe commit to be picked could be allowed to be omitted, defaulting to HEAD again, but as source this time. That said, might be 'git commit' looks like a nice candidate for being taught this new trick as well (optionally commit to a revision other than HEAD, what Ævar already mentioned), following the same logic... ;) It would even be a better (more straightforward) fit for one of your previous examples: > Another use case is when you receive a patch to be applied on a > different branch while you are in the middle of some work. If it can be > applied on the current branch, then you can post it to the destination, > rewind, and continue with your work. p.s. I`m very interested in this functionality, and more - I have a beginner`s attempt in addressing a similar use-case this topic is concerned with (symptomatically using a variation of "--onto" as well :P), hopefully I`ll sent out something soon, for the sake of discussion/opinion, at least :( Regards, Buga
