Re: [PATCH] check-ref-format: require a repository for --branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 07:45:46PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> [..]
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/check-ref-format.c b/builtin/check-ref-format.c
> index 1e5f9835f0..4e62852089 100644
> --- a/builtin/check-ref-format.c
> +++ b/builtin/check-ref-format.c
> @@ -38,12 +38,22 @@ static char *collapse_slashes(const char *refname)
>  
>  static int check_ref_format_branch(const char *arg)
>  {
> +	int nongit, malformed;
>  	struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +	const char *name = arg;
>  
> -	setup_git_directory();
> -	if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&sb, arg))
> +	setup_git_directory_gently(&nongit);
> +
> +	if (!nongit)
> +		malformed = (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&sb, arg) ||
> +			     !skip_prefix(sb.buf, "refs/heads/", &name));
> +	else
> +		malformed = check_branch_ref_format(arg);
> +

Would it make sense to swap the logic and get rid of the double
negative (!nongit)?

> +	if (malformed)
>  		die("'%s' is not a valid branch name", arg);
> -	printf("%s\n", sb.buf + 11);
> +	printf("%s\n", name);
> +	strbuf_release(&sb);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux