Hi, On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Kevin Daudt <me@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:19:15PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> From: J Wyman <jwyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> [..] > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt > >> index 39f50bd53eb..22767025850 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt > >> @@ -142,8 +142,9 @@ upstream:: > >> encountered. Append `:track,nobracket` to show tracking > >> information without brackets (i.e "ahead N, behind M"). > >> + > >> -Also respects `:remotename` to state the name of the *remote* instead of > >> -the ref. > >> +Also respects `:remotename` to state the name of the *remote* instead > >> +of the ref, and `:remoteref` to state the name of the *reference* as > >> +locally known by the remote. > > > > What does "locally known by the remote" mean in this sentence? > > Good question. I cannot offhand offer a better and concise > phrasing, but I think can explain what it wants to describe ;-). Yep, described it well. Maybe "and `:remoteref` to state the name by which the remote knows the *reference*"? Ciao, Dscho
