Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] for-each-ref: let upstream/push optionally remote ref name
>
> No verb? s/optionally/report/ perhaps?
I just noticed that I didn't tweak the copy I have in my tree after
sending this message, but now I did s/optionally/& report the/;
I am still puzzled by the hunk below, though.
>> @@ -1262,6 +1265,14 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
>> *s = xstrdup(remote);
>> else
>> *s = "";
>> + } else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_REMOTE_REF) {
>> + int explicit, for_push = starts_with(atom->name, "push");
>
> Hmph, the previous step got rid of starts_with() rather nicely by
> introducing atom->u.remote_ref.push bit; can't we do the same in
> this step?
>
> Other than that, looks nicer.
Thanks.
