On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 06:30:26PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello, > > > For version information it is far more useful to use --tags or no options > > (annotated tags only) instead of --all. > > so this output is useless if you don't have tagged the commit which > isn't the case. But thanks for the awareness. > No. Just _ONE_ tagged commit should be enough. In a project of mine I tagged the root commit and as I am the only committer and this project is so simple that I don't have to do a lot of branching/merging, I get a single line of history t - o1 - o2 - o3 - o4 <- master ^ |- tagged root commit This gives me very nicely enumerated commits like tag-1-g<sha1-abbrev> for the commit o1 and tag-2-g<sha1-abbrev> for o2 ... you get the idea. -Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
