Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So the thing here is: If we want to make sure that we stay backwards > compatible by supporting the setup with gitlinks without configuration. > Then we also should keep tests around that have the plain manual setup > without .gitmodules files. Just something, I think, we should keep in > mind. > > Apart from the tests nothing has been added in this iteration. Since I > finally have a working test now I will continue with reviving the > fallback to paths. Thanks for an update.
