On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Because we cannot quite tell between the two cases (one is error--we >> wrote or we thought we wrote, but we cannot find it, the other is >> dubious--somebody was racing with us in the filesystem), I think it >> is reasonable to err on the safer side, even though an error abort >> while doing "as we know we wrote the thing that match the index, we >> might as well lstat and mark the cache entry as up-to-date" might be >> a bit irritating. > > OK. I can live with that line of thought. Still that, or any other, line of thought we follow to declare that it is a good change should be recorded in the log ;-)
