lars.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> diff --git a/entry.c b/entry.c
> index 1c7e3c11d5..5dab656364 100644
> --- a/entry.c
> +++ b/entry.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int write_entry(struct cache_entry *ce,
> ce->name, new, size, &buf, dco);
> if (ret && string_list_has_string(&dco->paths, ce->name)) {
> free(new);
> - goto finish;
> + goto delayed;
> }
> } else
> ret = convert_to_working_tree(
This is unrelated to the main topic of this patch, but we see this
just before the precontext of this hunk:
if (dco && dco->state != CE_NO_DELAY) {
/* Do not send the blob in case of a retry. */
if (dco->state == CE_RETRY) {
new = NULL;
size = 0;
}
ret = async_convert_to_working_tree(
ce->name, new, size, &buf, dco);
Aren't we leaking "new" in that CE_RETRY case?
