[PATCH] branch: reset instead of release a strbuf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Our documentation advises to not re-use a strbuf, after strbuf_release
has been called on it. Use the proper reset instead.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Maybe one of the #leftoverbits is to remove the re-init call in release
and see what breaks? (And then fixing up more of such cases as presented
in this patch)

Thanks,
Stefan

 builtin/branch.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index b998e16d0c..9758012390 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char **argv, int force, int kinds,
 		if (!head_rev)
 			die(_("Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD"));
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_release(&bname)) {
+	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_reset(&bname)) {
 		char *target = NULL;
 		int flags = 0;
 
-- 
2.14.0.rc0.3.g6c2e499285




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux