Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Is this just me who wants to do s/fenc/quot/g? Unless somebody
>> objects, I'd do so while queuing.
>
> I don't object, I think that fencing is less appropriate than quoting.
> I couldn't find the term myself when writing this commit :-).
>
> I am happy to send out v5 of this patch series with this commit
> re-written, or you can change it while queuing. Whichever is easier for
> you.
Just FYI, here is what I ended up with. I do not think this is
about "modern" vs "old style"; it is more about using the more
appropriate mark-up and our desire has always been to use `literal`
for things that users need to type literally.
I notice that I didn't remove 'modern' from the title in the versoin
below, though.
Thanks.
commit a184d836bcf1a557520095a90b22edf659ee88f2
Author: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun Oct 1 09:18:50 2017 -0700
doc: use modern "`<literal>`"-style quoting for literal strings
"'<string>'"-style quoting is not appropriate when quoting literal
strings in the "Documentation/" subtree.
In preparation for adding additional information to this section of
git-for-each-ref(1)'s documentation, update them to use "`<literal>`"
instead.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
