Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2017, #03; Fri, 15)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Sat, 16 Sep 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> [Cooking]
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >> 
> >> * mk/diff-delta-uint-may-be-shorter-than-ulong (2017-08-10) 1 commit
> >>  ...
> >>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
> >>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >> 
> >> * mk/use-size-t-in-zlib (2017-08-10) 1 commit
> >>  ...
> >>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
> >>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> * mk/diff-delta-avoid-large-offset (2017-08-11) 1 commit
> >>  ...
> >>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
> >>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> [Discarded]
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >
> > These three topics are still in the wrong category. Please fix.
> 
> Hmph, but did the larger series these refer to actually land?

As I have to read these long mails to keep track of the current status of
some submissions, I do not care. However, in the context of this mail, it
does not make sense to have discarded patch series in the cooking section.
It's simply confusing.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux