Re: [PATCH] diff: correct newline in summary for renamed files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:58:52PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:

> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In 146fdb0dfe (diff.c: emit_diff_symbol learns about DIFF_SYMBOL_SUMMARY,
> 2017-06-29), the conversion from direct printing to the symbol emission
> dropped the new line character for renamed, copied and rewritten files.
> 
> Add the emission of a newline, add a test for this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>

The overall substance looks good, but...

> diff --git a/t/t4016-diff-quote.sh b/t/t4016-diff-quote.sh
> index 9c48e5c2c9..514056dd10 100755
> --- a/t/t4016-diff-quote.sh
> +++ b/t/t4016-diff-quote.sh
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>  	git add . &&
>  	git commit -m initial &&
>  	git mv "$P0.0" "R$P0.0" &&
> +	chmod a+x "R$P0.0" &&
>  	git mv "$P0.1" "R$P1.0" &&
>  	git mv "$P0.2" "R$P2.0" &&
>  	git mv "$P0.3" "R$P3.0" &&

Won't this chmod be a problem for platforms without an executable bit?
I think you'd need to use "update-index --chmod=+x" here, or require the
FILEMODE prereq.

The whole script is marked as !MINGW, so that makes it less of a
problem, but it's still possible have !FILEMODE on a Linux system, if
you're on a funny filesystem. That also seems like a good reason to make
sure this is in a script which is run more widely, since Windows folks
would want to run this test, too.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux