Re: [PATCH 0/3] Comment fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> follow more commit log conventions; verified it compiled (yay).

;-)

> (should I send patches that are in 'pu' again as well?)

Because these look more or less independent changes that can be
queued on separate topics, I do not think resending is needed at
all, even though mentioning that these do *not* replace what is
queued like you just did is an excellent way to prevent the
maintainer from making stupid mistakes.  Thanks.

> Han-Wen Nienhuys (3):
>   real_path: clarify return value ownership
>   read_gitfile_gently: clarify return value ownership.
>   string-list.h: move documentation from Documentation/api/ into header
>
>  Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt | 209 ----------------------------
>  abspath.c                                   |   4 +
>  setup.c                                     |   3 +-
>  string-list.h                               | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
>
> --
> 2.14.1.821.g8fa685d3b7-goog



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux