On 09/22, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> When creating a new branch B by copying the branch A that happens to
> be the current branch, it also updates HEAD to point at the new
> branch. It probably was made this way because "git branch -c A B"
> piggybacked its implementation on "git branch -m A B",
>
> This does not match the usual expectation. If I were sitting on a
> blue chair, and somebody comes and repaints it to red, I would
> accept ending up sitting on a chair that is now red (I am also OK to
> stand, instead, as there no longer is my favourite blue chair). But
> if somebody creates a new red chair, modelling it after the blue
> chair I am sitting on, I do not expect to be booted off of the blue
> chair and ending up on sitting on the new red one.
>
> Let's fix this before it hits 'next'. Those who want to create a
> new branch and switch to it can do "git checkout B" after doing a
> "git branch -c B", and if that operation is so useful and deserves a
> short-hand way to do so, perhaps extend "git checkout -b B" to copy
> configurations while creating the new branch B.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> * Let's send an updated one as a follow-up to the discussion thread
> that it is a follow-up to. The patch in this message is the same
> as the one I previously sent; the proposed log message has been
> updated somewhat.
>
> builtin/branch.c | 9 +++------
> t/t3200-branch.sh | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
> index 89f64f4123..e2e3692838 100644
> --- a/builtin/branch.c
> +++ b/builtin/branch.c
> @@ -506,12 +506,9 @@ static void copy_or_rename_branch(const char *oldname, const char *newname, int
> oldref.buf + 11);
> }
>
> - if (replace_each_worktree_head_symref(oldref.buf, newref.buf, logmsg.buf)) {
> - if (copy)
> - die(_("Branch copied to %s, but HEAD is not updated!"), newname);
> - else
> - die(_("Branch renamed to %s, but HEAD is not updated!"), newname);
> - }
> + if (!copy &&
> + replace_each_worktree_head_symref(oldref.buf, newref.buf, logmsg.buf))
> + die(_("Branch renamed to %s, but HEAD is not updated!"), newname);
>
> strbuf_release(&logmsg);
>
> diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
> index 5d03ad16f6..be9b3784c6 100755
> --- a/t/t3200-branch.sh
> +++ b/t/t3200-branch.sh
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git branch --copy is a synonym for -c' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'git branch -c ee ef should copy and checkout branch ef' '
> +test_expect_success 'git branch -c ee ef should copy to create branch ef' '
The new wording seems to be missing something. Maybe it should read:
'git branch -c ee ef should copy branch ee to create branch ef'
> git checkout -b ee &&
> git reflog exists refs/heads/ee &&
> git config branch.ee.dummy Hello &&
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git branch -c ee ef should copy and checkout branch ef' '
> git reflog exists refs/heads/ef &&
> test $(git config branch.ee.dummy) = Hello &&
> test $(git config branch.ef.dummy) = Hello &&
> - test $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) = ef
> + test $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) = ee
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'git branch -c f/f g/g should work' '
> @@ -494,12 +494,12 @@ test_expect_success 'git branch -C c1 c2 should succeed when c1 is checked out'
> git checkout -b c1 &&
> git branch c2 &&
> git branch -C c1 c2 &&
> - test $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) = c2
> + test $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) = c1
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'git branch -C c1 c2 should add entries to .git/logs/HEAD' '
> +test_expect_success 'git branch -C c1 c2 should never touch HEAD' '
> msg="Branch: copied refs/heads/c1 to refs/heads/c2" &&
> - grep "$msg$" .git/logs/HEAD
> + ! grep "$msg$" .git/logs/HEAD
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'git branch -C master should work when master is checked out' '
> --
> 2.14.1-929-g25eae544e9
>
The rest of the patch lgtm. I agree that this is probably a better UI
than without this patch. Especially since the vanilla behavior of git
branch is to create a new branch without moving you to that new branch.
--
Brandon Williams
