On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:47:23PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > Release `pathspec` and the string list `partial`. Makes sense. > When we clear the string list, make sure we do not free the `util` > pointers. That would result in double-freeing, since we set them up as > `item->util = item` in `list_paths()`. Also makes sense (and is kind of weird; it looks like we're just using it as a magic flag. But that's outside the scope of your patch). > Initialize the string list early, so that we can always release it. That > introduces some unnecessary overhead in various code paths, but means > there is one and only one way out of the function. If we ever accumulate > more things we need to free, it should be straightforward to do so. The overhead is fine. It's just writing the struct entries, not allocating anything. I wondered if the pathspec needed a similar initialization (since you can't tell just from reading the context), but no, it's initialized as the first thing in the function. > Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > builtin/commit.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Looks good to me. Thanks. -Peff
