Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fixes from the per-repository object store series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is a continuation of the series at [1].  That was part 1 ---
> you can think of this as part 0, since it contains the simplest and
> least controversial part of the series --- each patch in this series
> is a bugfix in its own right.
>
> Patch 1 should be familiar if you reviewed the series [1].  It is
> unchanged from the patch there, except to note Peff's ack.
>
> Patches 2-4 have not yet visited the list but are fixes (or, in the
> case of patch 4, cleanups) noticed as part of the same process of
> teaching object store code to handle multiple repositories.
>
> We hope that splitting these out should make them easier to review
> and for people to benefit from these fixes without having to wait
> for the rest of the series to settle.

One thing that is unclear is if you are tentatively withdrawing the
longer series with this update, but I'd assume that it is the case
because these two obviously will conflict with each other, and the
most of what these four patches do are subset of what the larger one
you sent earlier do.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux