Re: [PATCH 0/3] merge-base --fork-point fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:

> merge-base --fork-point does not quite work as advertised when the
> reflog is empty or partial. This series brings it in line with the
> documentation and, hopefully, with the original intent.
> 
> Michael J Gruber (3):
>   t6010: test actual test output
>   merge-base: return fork-point outside reflog
>   merge-base: find fork-point outside partial reflog

Patches 1 and 3 look sane to me. Your argument in patch 2 looks
plausible to me, but I'm not familiar enough with the mechanics of
fork-point to have a solid opinion.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux