Re: [PATCH 07/10] t1404: demonstrate two problems with reference transactions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 01:44:30PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > +	git for-each-ref $prefix >actual &&
> > +	grep "Unable to create $Q.*packed-refs.lock$Q: File exists" err &&
> 
> I added a squash for doing s/grep/test_i18n&/ here; are there other
> issues in the series, or is the series more or less ready to be
> polished in 'next'?

I think we'd want the test fix to avoid busy-waiting that was discussed
upthread. I just left a few comments, too. I suspect they will all be
answered without code changes, but I think we'd probably want to wait
for a v2.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux