On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 03:13:41PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This probably fixes it:
>
> Yup. Thanks.
Thanks for confirming. Here it is with a commit message and test.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] rev-parse: don't trim bisect refnames
Using for_each_ref_in() with a full refname has always been
a questionable practice, but it became an error with
b9c8e7f2fb (prefix_ref_iterator: don't trim too much,
2017-05-22), making "git rev-parse --bisect" pretty reliably
show a BUG.
Commit 03df567fbf (for_each_bisect_ref(): don't trim
refnames, 2017-06-18) fixed this case for revision.c, but
rev-parse handles this option on its own. We can use the
same solution here (and piggy-back on its test).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/rev-parse.c | 4 ++--
t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/rev-parse.c b/builtin/rev-parse.c
index 2bd28d3c08..9f24004c0a 100644
--- a/builtin/rev-parse.c
+++ b/builtin/rev-parse.c
@@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ int cmd_rev_parse(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
continue;
}
if (!strcmp(arg, "--bisect")) {
- for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/bad", show_reference, NULL);
- for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/good", anti_reference, NULL);
+ for_each_fullref_in("refs/bisect/bad", show_reference, NULL, 0);
+ for_each_fullref_in("refs/bisect/good", anti_reference, NULL, 0);
continue;
}
if (opt_with_value(arg, "--branches", &arg)) {
diff --git a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
index 534903bbd2..a661408038 100755
--- a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
+++ b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
@@ -236,17 +236,31 @@ test_sequence "--bisect"
#
#
-test_expect_success '--bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
+test_expect_success 'set up fake --bisect refs' '
git update-ref refs/bisect/bad c3 &&
good=$(git rev-parse b1) &&
git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
good=$(git rev-parse c1) &&
- git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
+ git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good
+'
+test_expect_success 'rev-list --bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
# the only thing between c3 and c1 is c2
git rev-parse c2 >expect &&
git rev-list --bisect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'rev-parse --bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
+ git rev-parse c3 ^b1 ^c1 >expect &&
+ git rev-parse --bisect >actual &&
+
+ # output order depends on the refnames, which in turn depends on
+ # the exact sha1s. We just want to make sure we have the same set
+ # of lines in any order.
+ sort <expect >expect.sorted &&
+ sort <actual >actual.sorted &&
+ test_cmp expect.sorted actual.sorted
+'
+
test_done
--
2.14.1.757.g8fad538cea
