Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > In the long run we may want to drop the "tempfiles must remain forever" > rule. This is certainly not the first time it has caused confusion or > leaks. And I don't think it's a fundamental issue, just the way the code > is written. But in the interim, this fix is probably worth doing. I notice you also have a series to rework the "must remain forever" on the list, but nevertheless let's take this one first. Will queue. Thanks.
