Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention that `eol` can change the dirty status of paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:

> How about something like this :
>
>   This attribute sets a specific line-ending style to be used in the
>   working directory.  It enables end-of-line conversion without any
>  -content checks, effectively setting the `text` attribute.
>  +content checks, effectively setting the `text` attribute.  Note that
>  +setting this attribute on paths which are in the index with CRLF
>  +line endings makes the paths to be considered dirty.

Is this "always makes them dirty" or "may make them dirty depending
on the situation"?  

If the latter, I'd prefer to see s/makes/may make/ here.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux