Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/25/2017 1:35 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,

Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:53:21PM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:

Another version of Git's wire protocol is a topic that has been discussed and
attempted by many in the community over the years.  The biggest challenge, as
far as I understand, has been coming up with a transition plan to using the new
server without breaking existing clients and servers.  As such this RFC is
really only concerned with solidifying a transition plan.  Once it has been
decided how we can transition to a new protocol we can get into decided what
this new protocol would look like (though it would obviously eliminate the ref
advertisement ;).


I don't think libgit2 implements the server side. That leaves probably
JGit, Microsoft's VSTS (which I think is custom), and whatever Atlassian
and GitLab use.

I'd be happy if someone tests the patches against those. :)

I just wanted to jump in here and say I've done some initial
testing of this against VSTS and so far it seems fine.  And yes,
we have a custom git server.

VSTS doesn't support the "git://" protocol, so the double-null trick
isn't an issue for us.  But "https://"; worked just fine.  I'm still
asking around internally whether we support passing SSH environment
variables.

Jeff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux