On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
In merge_trees if process_renames or process_entry returns less
than zero, the method will just return and not free re_merge,
re_head, or entries.
This change cleans up the allocated variables before returning
to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Willford <kewillf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nice catch on the leaks. Looks good to me.
---
merge-recursive.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 1494ffdb82..033d7cd406 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries);
clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge);
if (clean < 0)
- return clean;
+ goto cleanup;
for (i = entries->nr-1; 0 <= i; i--) {
const char *path = entries->items[i].string;
struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
@@ -1964,8 +1964,10 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
int ret = process_entry(o, path, e);
if (!ret)
clean = 0;
- else if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ else if (ret < 0) {
+ clean = ret;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
}
}
for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
@@ -1975,6 +1977,7 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
entries->items[i].string);
}
+cleanup:
string_list_clear(re_merge, 0);
string_list_clear(re_head, 0);
string_list_clear(entries, 1);
@@ -1982,6 +1985,9 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
free(re_merge);
free(re_head);
free(entries);
+
+ if (clean < 0)
+ return clean;
}
else
clean = 1;
