Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:14:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > For now I would suggest we put a protocol v2 in place that is
> > the current protocol + a version number coming through the
> > poked hole at the beginning; the goal and review of this series
> > ought to focus on getting the version handshake right...
> 
> Oh, we are in absolute agreement on that.  It would be nice if we
> can have new tests to demonostrate three combinations working well
> (i.e. use 'installed git' whose path is given externally on one end
> of the connection, while the just-built binary sits on the other
> end, in addition to making sure just-built binary successfully talks
> with itself).

The harness in t/interop can perhaps help with that (at least between
existing git versions; testing across other implementations makes the
setup a lot tricker).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux