Re: Should rerere auto-update a merge resolution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> In my hands, I need to tell rerere to forget, *and then recreate the merge
> conflict* before I can resolve it again and let rerere learn the new
> resolution.

I can believe that---that is how I originally desiged "forget" to
behave.

Even though My quick tests to prepare a reply to Martin seemed to
show that unmerging was not strictly needed in today's Git in order
to forget and learn new, I wouldn't be surprised if an explicit
unmerging in addition to "rerere forget" was necessary, especially
if the original preimage were very different from the state before
the botched resolution was applied.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux