On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 8 ++++++++
> revision.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> index a6cf9eb380..7d860bfca1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> @@ -184,6 +184,14 @@ explicitly.
> Pretend as if all objects mentioned by reflogs are listed on the
> command line as `<commit>`.
>
> +--single-worktree::
> + By default, all working trees will be examined by the
> + following options when there are more than one (see
> + linkgit:git-worktree[1]): `--all`, `--reflog` and
> + `--indexed-objects`.
> + This option forces them to examine the current working tree
> + only.
> +
> --ignore-missing::
> Upon seeing an invalid object name in the input, pretend as if
> the bad input was not given.
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index d100b3a3be..6eba4131b4 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -2251,6 +2251,8 @@ static int handle_revision_pseudo_opt(const char *submodule,
> return error("invalid argument to --no-walk");
> } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--do-walk")) {
> revs->no_walk = 0;
> + } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--single-worktree")) {
> + revs->single_worktree = 1;
This is in handle_revision_pseudo_opt, that has the note
/*
* NOTE!
*
* Commands like "git shortlog" will not accept the options below
* unless parse_revision_opt queues them (as opposed to erroring
* out).
*
* When implementing your new pseudo-option, remember to
* register it in the list at the top of handle_revision_opt.
*/
The registration needs to be done at around line 1700.
But come to think of it, is it really a pseudo opt?
Could it be a "real" (non pseudo) opt in handle_revision_opt?
The reasoning (either way) would be of interest in the
commit message, IMHO.
