"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:09:25PM +0200, Patryk Obara wrote: >> This enabled conversion of few functions in sha1_file, which >> had almost all callers converted already. >> >> I hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes with this patch series. >> If I do - is there some email thread or document in which I can >> coordinate with other developers, regarding which code regions >> are being converted to struct object_id next? > > We don't have a coordinated thread at the moment. You can see what I'm > working on at https://github.com/bk2204/git.git in the object-id-part10 > and object-id-part11 branches (based on an older next). > > However, having said that, I don't mind if you or others pick up various > parts of the codebase. At worst, I drop a few patches for things others > have already converted. Thanks for working well together ;-) I've scanned these patches and they looked OK. There still are places that dereferences oid->hash when making a call instead of passing a pointer to the whole oid, but that is not making things worse. As to the naming (your comments on 5/6), I agree that we would need to switch s/sha1/oid/ in the names in the endgame. It may be OK to leave it to later rounds when we do use something like your hash algorithm abstraction throughout the codebase.
