Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 03:47:28AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> Yeah, I don't think we want to go back to the original behavior. I agree >> that it is partially to blame for the inconsistency that started this >> thread, but I think on balance it has saved much more confusion than it >> has started. And we can address that inconsistency with better tag rules >> (like the "autofollow if we wrote any real refs" thing). >> >> I don't have a patch for that yet, so if anybody feels like taking a >> look, it would be much appreciated. > > Also: I don't think we've seen a patch yet for documenting the current > auto-follow behavior. Even if we don't make a behavior change, let's > not forget to improve that, which should be much less work. :) Thanks for two thoughtful follow-ups.
